Skip to content

GET BREAKING NEWS IN YOUR BROWSER. CLICK HERE TO TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS.

X

PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

By Bob Katzen

THE HOUSE AND SENATE. There were no roll calls in the House or Senate last week. This week, Beacon Hill Roll Call looks at Question 3, one of the four questions on the ballot that will be decided directly by the voters in November.

The question asks voters if they want to repeal a 2011 law legalizing gambling and allowing three casinos and one slot parlor in the Bay State. The state’s Gaming Commission has already awarded licenses to Penn National Gaming for a slot parlor at the Plainridge Racecourse in Plainville. It has also chosen MGM Resorts to build the Western Massachusetts casino in Springfield and Wynn Resorts for the Eastern one in Everett. The commission anticipates the Southeastern license will be awarded in August 2015.

Here are the official arguments, gathered by the secretary of state, by each side of the question:

FOR REPEAL: Written by Repeal the Casino Deal Committee. For info, go to question3facts.org or call 617-701-7823.

“Massachusetts can do better than casinos. Just ask the ‘experts’:

Governor Patrick, Speaker DeLeo and Senate President Murray agree: No casino in their hometowns.

The former CEO of American Gaming said he would ‘work very, very hard against’ a casino in his hometown.

Ledyard, Connecticut’s mayor said there has been ‘no economic development spin-off from (Foxwoods). Businesses do not come here.’

Moody’s downgraded its casino outlook from ‘stable’ to ‘negative’ and Fitch Ratings said the casino market ‘is reaching a saturation point.’

Indiana prosecutors needed an additional court just to handle casino-related crimes.

Listen to the experts. Vote Yes: Stop the casino mess.”

1. masslive.com/politics/ index.ssf/2013/11/gov_deval_patrick_says_he_woul.htm l

2. masslive.com/politics/ index.ssf/2013/11/like_deval_patrick_massachuset.html

3. lowellsun.com/breaking news/ci_24644606/like-patrick-and-deleo-murray-would-not-want

4. youtube.com/watch?v= ZbRYUEtpGVQ

5. seacoastonline.com/ articles/20031002-NEWS-310029963?cid=sitesearch

6. streetinsider.com/ Credit+Ratings/Moodys+Lowers+Outlook+on+U.S.+Gaming+Industry+to+Negative+(LVS)+(MGM)+(IGT)+(BYI)/9624468.html

7. Wall Street Journal, June 19, 2014, “Casino Boom Pinches Northeastern States Influx of Competition Leaves Early Players — Such as Delaware, New Jersey and West Virginia–Struggling to Keep Bets Flowing,” by Scott Calvert and Jon Kamp

8. repealthecasinodeal.org/ documents/KarenRichardsLetter.pdf”

AGAINST REPEAL: Written by Domenic Sarno, Mayor of Springfield. For info, go to protectmassjobs.com or call 617-520-4559.

“A ‘no’ vote will preserve the state’s Expanded Gaming Law, generating thousands of construction and permanent jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for our cities and towns. Every year Massachusetts residents spend close to $900,000,000 at casinos in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine, adding millions to their state budgets.

The law already has provided voters in several communities, including Springfield and Plainville, an opportunity to bring much-needed jobs and economic activity to their communities through first-class development projects. At the same time, the law has ensured that no community opposed to a casino within its borders will have one. To help further protect residents, the law contains industry leading consumer safeguards and dedicated public health funding.

Vote ‘no’ on Question 3 to create jobs, economic growth and much-needed new revenue in Massachusetts.”

LOCAL LEGISLATORS’ VOTES FROM 2011 ON CASINOS

In November 2011, the House 121-33 and the Senate 24-13, approved the casino bill and Gov. Deval Patrick signed it into law.

Two legislators, Reps. Brain Ashe, D-Longmeadow, and John Rogers, D-Norwood, both voted against the bill on this roll call but switched their votes on a later roll call and voted for it.

(A “Yes” vote is for the casinos. A “No” vote is against them.)

Sen. Eileen Donoghue, Yes; Sen. James Eldridge, No; Sen. Jennifer Flanagan, Yes; Rep. Jennifer Benson, Yes; Rep. Sheila Harrington, Yes

ALSO ON BEACON HILL

NURSE STAFFING RATIO — A new law that establishes nurse staffing ratios in intensive care units of hospitals went into effect last week. The measure limits the ratio to one nurse for one patient, or one nurse for two patients in special circumstances as assessed by the nurses on that unit.

Supporters say this will protect and even save the lives of critically ill patients. They note this is the first step toward the goal of having staffing ratios in every unit in every hospital.

ALLOW LIQUOR STORES TO OPEN EARLIER ON SUNDAYS (H 228) — Some liquor stores are gearing up for Sunday, October 25 — the first Sunday that liquor stores will be allowed to open at 10 a.m. Prior to passage of this new law in July, these stores were prohibited from opening until noon. A total ban on Sunday sales of alcohol was state law until 2003 when the ban was repealed.

Supporters say the measure will allow Bay State liquor stores to compete with those in border states that open before noon on Sundays.

Opponents say studies have shown the earlier hours do not increase liquor sales but rather spread existing sales out over a longer period of time.

WASTE DISPOSAL BAN — Last week the Patrick Administration’s statewide commercial food waste ban went into effect. The ban, regulated by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), requires any entity that disposes of at least one ton of organic material per week to donate or re-purpose the useable food. All remaining food waste must be shipped to a facility where it will be converted to clean energy or sent to composting and animal-feed operations.

“The food waste disposal ban is a critical piece of the Commonwealth’s strategy to reduce solid waste generation and support the production of clean, renewable energy,” said Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Maeve Vallely Bartlett. She said the ban will help the state reach its goal to reduce the waste stream by 30 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050.

Officials say the ban, which does not apply to private residences, will affect approximately 1,700 businesses and institutions, including supermarkets, colleges, hotels, convention centers, hospitals, nursing homes, large restaurants, and food service and processing companies.

CREDIT UNIONS (S 2379) — The Senate approved a bill allowing the banking commissioner to expand from the current 50 miles to 100 miles from the main branch the distance at which credit unions are permitted to have a branch office. Supporters said the measure also makes other changes that will help credit unions provide better services to their members.

TASER GUNS (H 3315) — A bill that would require all newly purchased taser guns used by police officers to include an audio recording device is languishing in a House committee since it was give initial approval there on June 26. The proposal would only take effect in cities or towns that approve it and also “grandfather in” existing taser guns already owned by the city or town.

Supporters say this will ensure there is an accurate audio recording when a taser gun is used so there won’t be any questions about what was said by the police officer or the person who is tased.

TELEFUNDRAISERS ON “DO NOT CALL” LIST (H 190) — Also stuck in committee is a bill that would add telefundraisers to the “Do Not Call Registry,” which restricts telemarketing companies doing business in the state by allowing consumers to sign up for the list and fining companies up to $5,000 if they call an individual on the list. Telefundraisers are private for-profit companies that raise money for charities but also take a percentage of the money they raise. The charities themselves would not appear on the list and would still be free to call anyone.

Under the bill, the phone solicitors would be required on each phone call to state the name of the private company for which they are working and, if asked, reveal how much of the money raised actually goes to the charity. Under current law, companies are allowed to say that 100 percent of the money goes to the charity because technically it does — at least until the charity pays the company its fee and the 100 percent is reduced to as low as 20 percent.

Supporters say many people, especially seniors, are being misled and fooled by these companies. They note the bill will increase the amount of money that goes directly to charities. The bill is being spearheaded by Pearl Cohen of Bridgewater, who was a telefundraiser for 17 years but is now working to expose and ban what she calls “unethical and deceptive practices” by these companies.

Join the Conversation

We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.